Innan jag publicerar artikeln ”Om det oacceptabelt acceptabla” av Mellanösternkännaren Gunnar Olofsson nedan, några ord från en artikel i Aftonbladet”
Israel begår folkmord i Gaza, slår den ledande forskargruppen IAGS fast. En av anledningarna som anges är att Israel dödat eller skadat fler än 50 000 barn. ”Israels politik och agerande i Gaza uppfyller de juridiska kriterier som krävs för folkmord”, skriver gruppen i sin resolution.”
Israelisk militär bombar ett sjukhus i Gaza, dödar patienter och sjukvårdspersonal samt flera journalister som arbetar för internationella nyhetsbyråer. “Det är fruktansvärda nyheter” konstaterar den svenska utrikesministern. “Det är oacceptabelt att journalister dödas i tjänsten”.
Oacceptabelt, således. Samma formulering har i olika grad använts av andra ministrar om andra händelser, på andra platser – inte minst i Palestina. Det mesta som drabbat palestinierna har varit och är oacceptabelt: massakrer på civila, raserande av bostadshus, attacker mot och förstörelse av sjukhus, mord på räddningsarbetare och sjukvårdspersonal, fördrivning, framkallande av svält.
Ja, hela ockupationen är enligt olika FN-organ, internationella domstolar, människorättsorganisationer och ledande politiker i grunden just – oacceptabel.
Vad betyder då oacceptabel? Och hur länge är någonting oacceptabelt innan det förvandlas till att bli acceptabelt? Gäller det överallt? Och alltid?
En filmsnutt ur en dokumentär från andra världskrigets Warszawa. I bakgrunden muren runt det judiska ghettot, där människor långsamt svälter ihjäl. Utanför ett normalt liv med spårvagnar och människor som skyndar förbi med portföljer och matkassar. En normalitet i det onormala. En oacceptabel situation, accepterad av omgivningen. Förövarna fick sina straff efter kriget. Och eftervärldens dom har varit hård.
Lastbilarna utanför Gaza, fullastade med mat till de hungrande som inte får ta del av den på grund av Israels blockad. En helt katastrofal situation enligt alla humanitära aktörer. Helt oacceptabel.
Men egentligen har situationen i Gaza under 16 år av blockad varit oacceptabel mest hela tiden: stängda gränser, begränsad införsel av förnödenheter, otjänligt vatten, icke fungerande avlopp, en sjukvård som inte kunnat ge behandlingar för allvarliga sjukdomar som cancer och människor som hindrats lämna området för vård.
Ett gigantiskt utomhusfängelse i princip obeboeligt enligt FN. Men på något sätt accepterat av politiker besjälade av hög moral och kristna värderingar.
När nu ockupationsmakten godkänt planer på ytterligare 5.300 bostäder på palestinsk mark, och att området delas mitt itu för att hindra en sammanhållen palestinsk stat, är det helt oacceptabelt enligt världssamfundet – som även tidigare i många år förklarat det israeliska bosättandet på ockuperad mark oacceptabelt och utan giltighet. Men varför har man då så länge accepterat det?
Det sägs att en flyttkartong som inte öppnats på ett par år inte behöver öppnas alls eftersom ingen uppenbarligen efterfrågat innehållet. Om samma tanke används om Palestina har situationen – då man inte gjort något för att förändra den – sedan länge förvandlats från oacceptabel till acceptabel. Eller rättare sagt kanske oacceptabelt acceptabel.
Den ryska invasionen av Ukraina, oacceptabel enligt internationell lag, resulterade i omedelbara reaktioner från omvärlden med ekonomiskt och vapenstöd till de ockuperade, och upprepade sanktionspaket (i nuläget 18 stycken!) mot ockupationsmakten. Här betyder uppenbarligen oacceptabelt – oacceptabelt.
Men hur skall vi veta när våra makthavare menar att oacceptabelt betyder oacceptabelt? Eller tvärtom?
Ja, vad gäller Palestina är det enkelt: oacceptabelt betyder acceptabelt. Frågan är då om detta är – acceptabelt?
Bli gärna månadsgivare!
Du kan också donera med Swish till 070-4888823.
Människan har nu passerat ytterligare en gräns,
där inga ord har någon som helst betydelse,
ställd på den självgoda västvärlden agenda
där man vill hävda att civilisationens vagga stod
med all världens humana värdegrund till stöd.
Ett genomskådat hyckleri med effekt av blodspillan
uppenbarad på en avlägsen strand- i öppen dager,
där familjeband i generationers led slits sönder
av den koloniala vapenmaktens självbedrägeri
Det är tröttsamt att se ständiga jämförelser om ”Warszawa” hit och ghetto dit!!! Varför ska dessa vara mått på allting? Varför ska dessa dras oavsett vilka händelser det handlar om? Varför? Vi måste kunna berätta om det värsta folkmordet utan att dra tveksamma jämförelser
Ett folkmord pågår i Palestina nu, utfört av fucking mördar sionister. Period!!!
Detta folkmord utförs av HUSSE. Hela världen vet vilka västs ledare bugar till eller likt tränade sälar applåderar till. Det är just därför som det blir bara läpparnas bekännelser om att det ”oacceptabelt” från västpolitiker. Inga sanktioner. Tvärtom västpolitiker och ledare är medskyldiga i detta folkmord (med militär, finansiell och diplomatisk hjälp till folkmördarna bl a).
Om någon skulle befria världen från folkmördaren Benjamin Netanyahu, d v s skicka denne till helvetet det han hör hemma, skulle denne hållas ansvarig eller hyllas som en hjälte? Det senare skulle jag tro.
Men vem vet FBI skulle kanske efterlysa befriaren som ”terrorist” och efterlysa denne med en belöning på XX miljoner dollar. Mug Photo med poster ”Wanted for the MURDER of GENOCIDAL B Netanyahu” och så nederst XX Million $$.
Det finns en annan folkmördare och äkta sadist – Belsebub Smuts-reich och som vikarierar som finansminister i folkmördarnas land israel, som också behöver avlägsnas. Egentligen skulle världen må bra av att en hel kabinett av satans avkomman skickades till sin anfader.
Jemen som vanligt visar världen hur man handskas med satans avkomman med det enda språket de förstår: ett känsligt militär mål träffades eller fick besök av Jemenitiska missiler igår onsdag. Det är självklart hush-hush i västmedier (vi skriver/talar inte när Husse får stryk). Mer lär komma från Jemen.
Former UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn will host a two-day tribunal in London to expose the role of the British government in Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.
Set for Thursday and Friday at Church House in Westminster, the hearings will gather UN officials, aid workers, medics, legal experts, and journalists, including UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese.
Organizers said in a statement on Wednesday, “The public deserves to know the truth. That is why we are holding the Gaza Tribunal. We will uncover the truth.”
They said the focus would be on Britain’s legal responsibilities and the consequences of its military and political support for Israel.
The tribunal follows Corbyn’s failed push for a formal inquiry in parliament earlier this summer.
On June 4, he introduced a bill demanding an independent investigation into the UK’s involvement in Israel’s war on Gaza, from supplying arms and surveillance aircraft to allowing Royal Air Force bases to be used.
Despite support from dozens of MPs and more than 20 aid groups, the proposal was blocked by the ruling Labour Party.
The Gaza Tribunal comes amid mounting pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, with hundreds of thousands of Britons joining protests demanding an end to his government’s support for Israel.
Recent YouGov polling shows a majority of Britons sympathize with Palestinians, and many now describe Israel’s war on Gaza as genocide.
The UK government nonetheless continues to supply critical F-35 fighter jet components to Israel.
Last September, the government suspended 30 of 350 arms export licenses after finding a clear risk of violations of international humanitarian law — but F-35 parts, central to the bombing campaign in Gaza, were exempted.
Concerns have also been raised over British surveillance flights over Gaza, reportedly launched from Cyprus without any parliamentary approval.
Rights groups have constantly warned that such collaboration could directly implicate the UK in war crimes and genocide.
Reports show that Starmer’s government authorized approximately $160 million in arms exports to Israel between October and December 2024, according to strategic export licensing records.
Källa: Press TV
Filmen om Hind Rajab vars liv samling shlomo smuts reich kväste vann beröm i Venedig
”A documentary depicting the plight of a Palestinian child, Hind Rajab, who was martyred last year after Israeli forces struck the car she was hiding in with hundreds of tank shells, has drawn a 22-minute-long standing ovation, tearful reactions, and waving Palestinian flags.
The avalanche of emotion followed The Voice of Hind Rajab’s premier at the world-class Venice Film Festival on Wednesday, various movie news outlets reported.
The documentary features various audio recordings featuring the voice of the Palestinian girl, who was killed in the Gaza Strip in January 2024.
It centers on her and her family’s struggle amid the Israeli regime’s yet-ongoing war of genocide against the coastal sliver.
Rajab’s family were targeted while fleeing Gaza City in their car, leading to the five-year-old child’s losing her uncle, aunt, and three cousins.
She, herself, was killed after Israeli forces shelled the vehicle reportedly 335 times, despite her being the only remaining occupant, who had already spent hours inside trying to contact paramedics.
The shelling was so intense that claimed the lives of all the paramedics, who finally reached there, too, leaving rescuers to find only a pile of bodies at the scene.
The genocide has so far claimed the lives of more than 63,700 Palestinians, mostly women and children, since its onset in October 2023.
The Israeli regime has refused to consent to any framework for a potential ceasefire deal, despite concessions provided by Gaza’s Palestinian resistance movement Hamas and attempts by mediators to help carve out an agreement.
The regime has, meanwhile, almost entirely blocked entry of all direly-needed aid supplies into Gaza, triggering hundreds of starvation-related deaths.
The documentary has been directed by celebrated Tunisian director Kaouther Ben Hania, and boasts star-studded Hollywood actors Joaquin Phoenix and Rooney Mara as its executive producers.
The duo attended the premiere, holding a photo of Hind with the filmmakers on the red carpet.
Phoenix was wearing an “Artists for Ceasefire” pin and actor Motaz Malhees, who starred in the documentary, waved a Palestinian flag during the ovation.
Participants also chanted “Free Palestine,” while reacting to the movie that many observers predict is a frontrunner for the festival’s coveted Golden Lion award.”
Den här gången i lill-Britannien där de fick vapenkontrakt på 2 miljarder pund – d v s ca 250 miljarder SEK
Britain’s Ministry of Defence might imminently award a 15-year contract, worth £2.5bn, to a consortium headed by the British subsidiary of the Israeli arms firm Elbit Systems and including the U.S. management consultancy firm, Bain and Company.
If successful, Elbit’s consortium would be responsible for training as many as 60,000 members of the U.K. military.
The consortium seems well-placed to win the contract; it is, in fact, one of only two shortlisted and preferred bidders.
The Ministry of Defence has already given the consortium a £2m contract so that it can develop its proposals further.
This is unacceptable. And it is frankly unbelievable that this consortium is even in the running considering its track record.
Elbit Systems UK is the fully owned subsidiary of Elbit Systems Limited. Elbit Systems Limited is headquartered in Tel Aviv and is listed on both the Israeli and U.S. stock exchanges.
Elbit is one of the two largest Israeli weapons manufacturers and is central to the IDF’s operations, providing 85% of its drones. Elbit International is also a major contributor to the F-35 fighter jet program, bragging that it plays a “critical role” in the “success of the world’s most advanced fighter jet.”
Francesca Albanese, U.N. special rapporteur on Palestine, April 10, 2024, during an EU Parliament public hearing on Gaza in Brussels. (The Left, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
In July 2025, Francesca Albanese, the U.N. Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestine Territories, published an excoriating report setting out corporate complicity in Israel’s “plausibly” genocidal conduct in Gaza – for which she was subsequently sanctioned by Donald Trump.
Her report is clear that Elbit forms a central part of Israel’s military-industrial complex, which has become “the economic backbone of [Israel].”
“Elbit has cooperated closely on Israeli military operations, embedding key staff in the Ministry of Defence,” Albanese points out, further noting that Elbit provides “a critical domestic supply of weaponry.”
Bain
But we’re also deeply concerned about Elbit’s partner, Bain and Company.
Bain and Company (not to be confused with the mega hedge fund Bain Capital, which confirmed to us that it is not involved in the Elbit consortium) is a U.S.-based management consultancy firm.
Bain’s inclusion in the consortium’s bid was first reported in 2023 by the U.K. military magazine, Shephard News, based on unpublished behind-the-scenes documents.
Bain has a sordid and shocking history. In August 2022, the Cabinet Office placed Bain and Company on a “blacklist,” preventing it from getting any Cabinet Office contracts.
Jacob-Rees Mogg, the Tory Minister then responsible for the decision, explained that he had determined that Bain was “guilty of grave professional misconduct which renders its integrity questionable.”
This was because Bain was at the centre of a huge political and corruption scandal in South Africa. It was, in fact, considered to be one of the most damaging and outrageous cases of so-called “state capture” that took place under the scandal-ridden presidency of Jacob Zuma.
State capture involved private actors and businesses colluding with politicians, like Zuma, to “capture” state institutions for corrupt gain.
In 2022, a major judicial commission of inquiry (the Zondo Commission of Inquiry, headed by Chief Justice Raymond Zondo) made damning findings about Bain’s conduct in South Africa.
It found that Bain had worked closely with Zuma’s acolyte, Tom Moyane, to plot to take over the South African Revenue Service (SARS) – South Africa’s version of HMRC (His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs).
Bain helped Moyane plan for his first 100 days in charge, while Bain consultants met secretly with Zuma to hatch long-term plans to radically “reform” SARS.
Under Moyane, SARS’ well-respected units fighting serious organised economic crime were disemboweled; at the same time, Bain was awarded a lucrative “consultancy” contract. SARS is still recovering.
Zondo found: “The SARS evidence is a clear example of how the private sector colluded with the Executive, including President Zuma, to capture an institution that was highly regarded internationally and render it ineffective.”
Zondo also found that the Bain case was relatively unique in that it was “one of the few instances where President Zuma was himself directly and personally involved in the activities and plans to take over a government entity.’’
‘Self-Cleansed’
Bain and Company threatened legal action following the U.K.’s decision to blacklist the company.
In 2023, the Tories relented and removed Bain from the blacklist, saying that Bain and Company had proved it had “self-cleansed,” despite allegations that Bain’s London and Boston offices had spent years trying to cover up the scandal.
Remarkably, the incoming Labour government was reported to have looked into the possibility of reintroducing the ban.
Responding to a letter from Labour peer Peter Hain in October 2024, cabinet minister Pat McFadden, said he had inquired about reinstating the ban but was told there were “no legal routes to do so.”
He nevertheless said he shared Hain’s concerns. So why is this Labour government now on the cusp of giving this same company a share of a 15-year contract?
In South Africa, Bain was put on a ten-year procurement blacklist, which remains in place.
In July this year it was confirmed that Bain had shut down its South African consultancy operations, with the Financial Times reporting insiders saying that the company’s local reputation had been destroyed by the scandal.
The carcass of Bain’s South African business would be repurposed as a “hub” to support Bain’s other international work.
These are the types of companies that the U.K. is poised to mainline into the very DNA of the British military and the British state: Elbit, its parent company one of the most important partners to the IDF in Gaza; and Bain and Company, only recently blacklisted for serious professional misconduct for its role in undermining the fabric of South Africa’s democracy.
The idea that the U.K. would award this consortium, and these companies, any sort of contract, never mind a 15-year contract of such importance, is an outrage. It must be stopped.
Källa: https://consortiumnews.com/2025/09/03/labour-elbits-2-billion-military-deal/
Inkludera Epstein/Maxwell blakmail for israel operation i det oacceptabelt acceptabla
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/we-are-living-through-the-jeffrey-epstein-genocide/
Ett minimum är väl att Sverige följer Jemens exmpel?